A
Anonymous
Guest
bigmac3161 said:Please don't Peugeot
iv'e just been sick a little bit after looking at that :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Peugeot RCZ Forum
Register a free account today to become a member. It's free! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, connect with other members through your own private inbox and take part in competitions!
iv'e just been sick a little bit after looking at that :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
A
Anonymous
Guest
Aaah..the magna steyr rears its ugly armadillo head once again. Simply terrible.
A
Anonymous
Guest
bigmac3161 said:
Please DO :mrgreen:
The car itself doesn't look good, I guess it REALLY hard to create a convertible which still shows the typical RCZ features...
BUT I WANT THOSE DARK REAR LIGHTS ON MINE!
If they build the convertible, you'll get this dark lights as street-legal(!) replacement parts.
A
Anonymous
Guest
Abzynthe
New Member
TomC said:
Just tint the ones you have
You can SPI vision them. Im getting my front lights tinted on Sunday, but I might see what the back will look like aswell
A
Anonymous
Guest
Abzynthe said:Just tint the ones you have
Not allowed here in Germanistan
Abzynthe
New Member
Oh right
A
Anonymous
Guest
Sad but true
A
Anonymous
Guest
Made me laugh
A
Anonymous
Guest
bigmac3161 said:
Made me laugh
Minted....lol :lol:
A
Anonymous
Guest
bigmac3161 said:
Sad but true
Avril.... :crazy: would think i am doing Both at the same time.................... :lol: :lol: Such a Gigolo i am :wtf:
A
Anonymous
Guest
bigmac3161 said:
Made me laugh
I see some of the lads have given this "Lady" the "Thumbs Up Kudos" , :eusa-think:
Talk about sending out mixed messages :? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Taff's accompanying fine looking sheep dont sound so strange now eh lads, or do it
:lol: :lol: :lol:
A
Anonymous
Guest
For those of you following the trails and tribulations of my Industrial Tribunal case.....
The judgement of the Employment Tribunal is that:
1. The Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal is well founded and succeeds.
2. No compensatory award shall be made for unfair dismissal.
3. The claimant was wrongfully dismissed in breach of contract.
So I have cleared my name but at a huge expense. My savings are gone and I remain with a large bill still owing to my solicitor. He is the only winner in this sad affair :thumbdown:
The judgement of the Employment Tribunal is that:
1. The Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal is well founded and succeeds.
2. No compensatory award shall be made for unfair dismissal.
3. The claimant was wrongfully dismissed in breach of contract.
So I have cleared my name but at a huge expense. My savings are gone and I remain with a large bill still owing to my solicitor. He is the only winner in this sad affair :thumbdown:
A
Anonymous
Guest
Wo wo wo...you were wrongfully dismissed in breach of contract yet you are to receive no compensation AND have to cover your own court costs?! On which CRAZY world does that make any sense?!?!
frankvdb
Member
I would at least have expected the other party to be sentenced to pay your legal costs. :?
This appears very unfair.
This appears very unfair.
A
Anonymous
Guest
Expenses are not awarded in Industrial Tribunal cases. I always knew this. However I wrongly assumed that by proving that I was unfairly dismissed would result in compensation being awarded which would more than cover my legal costs.
I have an outstanding bill of £7200 for the solicitor and have paid him circa £9K already. The only positive for me is that my name has been cleared. This may or may not help with future employment. How will a potential employer view a candidate that is potentially going to take them to an Industrial Tribunal?
I have an outstanding bill of £7200 for the solicitor and have paid him circa £9K already. The only positive for me is that my name has been cleared. This may or may not help with future employment. How will a potential employer view a candidate that is potentially going to take them to an Industrial Tribunal?
A
Anonymous
Guest
Excuse my french but that sounds arse about tit Ron! It's astounding that you won but didn't get anything to compensate for the stress and surely loss of earnings?
Man that's rough justice! :-(
Man that's rough justice! :-(
A
Anonymous
Guest
photojohn said:
That's exactly how I feel. I accept that I had an accident at work. I do not accept that the accident was caused deliberately by me. The judge accepted this in the judgement and says that I was unfairly dismissed. So why should they not be made pay what it has cost me to prove this?
The facts remain that I was unfairly dismissed and that I am circa £14k out of pocket :thumbdown: British justice :evil:
A
Anonymous
Guest
The first thing that springs to mind is a re trial (not common in employment law but still possible) but it risks loosing more money. Which I'm sure at this point is not a thing you want to do.
Could this not now be taken to county court to sue for lose?
Could this not now be taken to county court to sue for lose?
A
Anonymous
Guest
I'm staggered! Ron, it's fantastic that you've cleared you good name but gutted for you that our employment law can let bad employers off the hook with such ease.
Photojohn's suggestion seems well worth looking into. You now have a legal decision in your favour. Perhaps your ex-employer will be amenable to an out of court settlement if you were to bring a civil case in view of that.
You might also want to ask your own solicitor why he didn't tell you there was no likelihood of compensation. He should have given you various scenarios of how the case might go before you committed to the proceedings.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
Photojohn's suggestion seems well worth looking into. You now have a legal decision in your favour. Perhaps your ex-employer will be amenable to an out of court settlement if you were to bring a civil case in view of that.
You might also want to ask your own solicitor why he didn't tell you there was no likelihood of compensation. He should have given you various scenarios of how the case might go before you committed to the proceedings.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4