A
Anonymous
Guest
Would the alloys be covered under warranty?
Peugeot RCZ Forum
Register a free account today to become a member. It's free! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, connect with other members through your own private inbox and take part in competitions!
A
Anonymous
Guest
In what sense? If they are noticeably corroding or something then yes they would be but this is at the discretion of your dealer and Peugeot.
A
Anonymous
Guest
Dealers discretion, some will some wont!
A
Anonymous
Guest
Sorry to be pedantic, however I do have a reputation to maintain :lol: Surely all warranty work is carried out via the Peugeot UK dealer network and invoiced to Peugeot UK. So my thinking is that Peugeot UK would be the ones that decide what will and what will not be covered under warranty and the decisions would not be made on an ad hoc basis by the dealerships?bradshaw said:
A
Anonymous
Guest
Well señor pedant, pretty certain that I already said that it was at their joint discretion (as the dealership do not have to take the concern even as far as to Peugeot). 
You're right about the who pick up the tab though.
You're right about the who pick up the tab though.
A
Anonymous
Guest
There is noticable bubbling on a couple of wheels, but one has had some refurb at one time or other?
Mike
Mike
A
Anonymous
Guest
Reading this I'm now thinking a used car? Warranty issues are definitely not treat equally with those of the original owner.Sweetkid said:
A
Anonymous
Guest
A warranty is transferable between ownership, therefore if there is warranty left on the car it should include the alloys.
It should not and does matter if you are a first owner or otherwise.
Obviously the damage must be through manufacture and not something like kirbing.
It should not and does matter if you are a first owner or otherwise.
Obviously the damage must be through manufacture and not something like kirbing.
A
Anonymous
Guest
OO58RON said:
If a third party repair has been carried out before Peugeot have had chance to inspect and carry out work under warranty, then I think you would have lost your opportunity to make a claim under the warranty.
Never ever get a repair done, then try to make a warranty claim if that repair fails :thumbdown:
A
Anonymous
Guest
Jactac I was thinking more down the route of customer service. If you took a disputable warranty claim back to the dealership that you had bought it from, then I feel that you are more likely to achieve a better outcome than one who hadn't bought it from them new. Clearly any warranty work would be done that was indisputable, I was thinking more the is it or isn't it covered issues
A
Anonymous
Guest
Mmm, I'm not so sure.
As you know I bought my Z from Marcus at Milton Keynes, but I have taken the car back under warranty a few times to my local dealer here in Swansea, and all was fine.
Maybe if you got the sales dept involved it would have a bit more "clout". However I think this would only be the case if, as you say you had a disputable claim.
Normal claims should be treated exactly the same for the "used" owner as the new owner.
As you know I bought my Z from Marcus at Milton Keynes, but I have taken the car back under warranty a few times to my local dealer here in Swansea, and all was fine.
Maybe if you got the sales dept involved it would have a bit more "clout". However I think this would only be the case if, as you say you had a disputable claim.
Normal claims should be treated exactly the same for the "used" owner as the new owner.