A
Anonymous
Guest
Does appear that the HDI versions hold the value the best. The 156 seems to always be sold at a lower price. Might just be down to the fact it was cheaper to start with.
robinsstevenj said:^. That's utter rubbish. If you got yours new or nearly new you have lost the biggest bulk of the money already. If it's a good car keep it.
robinsstevenj said:^. That's utter rubbish. If you got yours new or nearly new you have lost the biggest bulk of the money already. If it's a good car keep it.
mrizzle said:Think it's getting awfully close to the time that you have to make a decision whether to hang on to the RCZ or say goodbye before you're offered a pittance for it. I sold mine (as you know) in April and got £14.5 for mine. I'd have been gutted to have let it go for much less. However, what was more important to me was the cost to change.
I dearly hope that you can get something sorted that you're happy with Jactac as I know that you've been looking around for some time now. I'm astonished at the cost of that Cupra!![]()
jactac said:That is the problem Rizzo, do we hold onto what is basically a barely run in car and keep it a few more years just adding mileage, or take what I think is a bit of a kicking and get shot of it now before it devalues anymore
smarty said:I was told my rcz was worth14500 for my 63 hdi gt , 3000 miles, :thumbdown:
jactac said:Its just a bit of a shame that buyers who bought/buy new seem to take a bit of a kicking compared to some other marques.
jactac said:I think what is clear is that the RCZ has to be a top contender for anyone looking for a good looking car that comes with a bag full of toys, and is priced very competitively in the used market..
Its just a bit of a shame that buyers who bought/buy new seem to take a bit of a kicking compared to some other marques.