Yes, I agree too, if that is the actual case.
I wasn't told my brake fluid was tested and needed replacing, simply that it was recommended by Peugeot so hand over the £40 and we will do it.
I may be turning into a sceptical old man, but I am always very suspicious about main dealers "checking if something actually needs doing" before going ahead and asking for the cash to get it done.
1. The dealer is there to make money, not to offer services.
2. If the car manufacturer recommends something is done, it probably should be done.
3. If they do it and it was necessary, no problem, if they do it and it wasn't necessary, no problem.
4. Might as well do it anyway then, and get a bit more profit from the already extortionate service costs.
I have had cars (not to the performance standards of the RCZ) for many years that have never had brake fluid changes. I have never had a problem with brakes not working as well as they should because of this.
I will be having the fluid changed at the next service, which will be in 11 months time, when the car is 3 years old. This is only because it is playing on my mind now that I didn't have it done at its second service, as recommended by Peugeot, and if anything ever happened while my wife was driving the car that could be linked to the brake fluid, how bad would I feel for the sake of £40
I will probably be changing the car at the end of the service plan, but if I don't, it will NOT be going back to a main dealer for any work/servicing etc, as it will be out of warranty, and I think there are garages that do a better job for less money.